Niaidroose's Blog

Just another weblog


As ICT Final Test of Post Graduate Program

English Education Department Of UHAMKA University.

Lecturer: HArtoyo, M.A., Ph.D.


Though computers are being used increasingly in educational contexts, little research on using computers in reading instruction exists. As Nuttal (2005) states that “the aims of reading program are to enable students to enjoy (or at least feel comfortable with) reading in the foreign language, and to read without help unfamiliar texts, at appropriate speed, silently and with adequate understanding.” The students are able to enjoy reading some texts if they understood well, so it needs more comprehension, as the comprehension means the capability to give details about grammar and structure of a page of text, it also means the ability to sum up the thesis and argument of a whole book in a few sentences (Ann and Lee, 1997). According to the aims of reading, the teachers use many methods to teach as they do their effort to make the students enjoy reading the text and achieve the purposes; moreover they use the computers to assist language learning. This paper discusses what reasons do the teachers use computers to develop reading skills; is it possible to use computers? Is it sensible or appropriate to use computers for such purposes?


As we know, teachers have some methods to teach English as second language, to make the students are able to speak fluently and write well, and also comprehend the text. Those are named by “language skills” (listening, reading, speaking and writing).  Reading is a part of language skills. Brynes (1998, 2 ) states ”Reading is an interactive process that goes on between the reader and the text, resulting in comprehension. The text presents letters, sentences, and paragraphs that encode the meaning.”

According to Brynes’ definition, reading can be either language skill or process which determines the reader to use knowledge, skills and strategies. Reader knowledge, skills and strategies include:

  1. Linguistic competence as the ability to recognize the elements of the writing system; understanding of vocabulary: comprehension of how words are structured into sentences.
  2. Discourse competence it is the knowledge of discourse markers and how they fix parts of the text to one another.
  3. Sociolinguistic competence as knowledge about different type of texts and their usual structure and content.
  4. Strategic competence it is the ability to use top down strategies as well as knowledge of the language (Bryners 1998, 2).

Moreover, reading and the type of text have the purpose to determine the specific knowledge, skills and strategies that the reader need to apply to achieve reading comprehension. Because reading comprehension is more than decoding, it results when the reader knows which skill and strategies are suitable for the type of text, and understands how to relate them to complete the purpose (Bryners 1998,2).


Technological advances continue to expand possibilities for using computers to support reading instruction. An important application is in direct instruction of basic skills. Computers offer engaging, interactive activities for general and targeted practice. They give student immediate corrective feedback, and some programs provide incentives for progress to higher levels of difficulty. Teachers also use programs to track student progress.

Further, computers allow students to create and share work. Some software allows them to create graphics and multimedia projects, while word processing facilitates writing projects. The internet allows information sharing through such resources such online research, personal web pages, and e-mail. Moreover, electronic references allow students to conduct research more easily and in new and different ways from traditional research.


One of the biggest concerns of teachers and instructors is that students are failing to learn critical reading skills that they need to progress satisfactory through the upper levels of their education. Commercial reading software developers have worked hard to create software that gives learners real opportunities to read critically and develop critical reading, and critical thinking, skills. As Levy (2008) states that there are three main reasons for teachers why they use the computers for teaching reading skills. They are:

  1. Computer software is interactive.

The most important benefits of commercial reading software is its ability to engage the students. Most current reading requires that a student do more than merely punch buttons. The interactive software provides students with the chance to produce their own questions and leads the students through guided practice situations. Newer software has even developed ways for students to interact with each other via the internet. Students work together in virtual groups to expand the learning experience.

2. Computer software uses scientifically-assisted educational research.

The reality is that educational software that purports to teach without the assistance of sound research and statistics often fails to hit the mark when it comes to really educating children. It is important to use software based on established teaching strategies as well as credible research studies.

3. Computers software creates a “real” learning development.

Until the advent of desktop computers, reading experiences were limited ti print materials. Early programs were only used as supplements to a general reading lesson, rather than acting as a stand-alone reading experience. These factors meant that early computer reading programs could not meet the needs of children learning to read critically.


Research is just beginning to clarify the cognitive and effective consequences of using computers to teach literacy. Investigations have shown that computer tools can enhance instruction. The use of word processors can produce better writing. Multimedia presentations can facilitate comprehension. Computers benefits diverse Learner by allowing for individualized instruction. Computerized vocabulary tools enhance second language learners’ comprehension, and computer-assisted instruction teaches basic reading skills to students at risk. Moreover, studies have found effects on engagement and interest, particularly for students with learning difficulties. And the advantages are:

  1. Interaction

1.1.Man-machine interaction.

The interactive potential of CAL has been extolled for the last twenty-five years or more. For example, Rigney (1962, 156) writes: “It is … an interactive notion that a computer can be programmed to interact dynamically with one or more students.”

1.2.Interpersonal interaction

In Talking about ‘interaction’, Rigney and his contemporaries were thinking in terms of communication between man and machine, and it has been largely in these terms that CAL has developed. In language acquisition, however, most interaction is between people. Indeed, for Wells and the interactionists, the very purpose of first language acquisition is to make interaction possible (Wells 1981, 16). Interaction is the goal and language the means. The central role of interaction in language acquisition has been emphasized in recent research (e.g Ellis 1984), and in the whole tradition of communicative teaching.

The use of computers within interactive settings as an element in a group practice is well established.

1.3.Reader – text interaction

Another form of interaction which is particularly important in the context of reading is between reader and text (Widdowson 1979, 173). In this approach, the computer can be conceived of as an aid, supplementing the printed page or other teaching material, and not providing the total learning environment. This approach would see it as the teacher’s task to create the learning environment, using the computer as an element within it just as she might use integrated skills practice or an overhead projector.

Thus computers can play a variety of interactive roles. They can promote interaction of various sorts-between man and machine (which is generally absorbing and motivating), between people (which is likely to promote language acquisition), and between reader and text (where the computer often plays a supportive role).

2.  Power

The calculating power of computer is legendary, together with their capacity to search speedily through databases or print text up on the screen. In reality, however, the microcomputers generally used for CAL work are essentially toy instruments, sometimes even derided by computers scientists with their considerably more powerful mainframe computers.

There are some programs that allow the teacher to specify several possible ‘correct responses’, but it is often impossible for her to anticipate all the zany responses that may come up. Other words, computers can actually be constraining and limiting. It is not enough simply to blame the software, for the problem also derives from the limited power of the machine and the near impossibility of anticipating all possible responses.

Indeed, work with computers tends to make one realize how flexible and cognitively powerful human teachers are. Thus computers can be described as powerful but only within certain restricted domains. For the reader these include text manipulation exercises, lexical and technical databases, speed reading exercises and simulation.


Despie any limitations of memory or processing power, computers are surprisingly adaptable and versatile devices. All the vocabulary recognition strategies described by Williams (1985) could be practiced with CAL programs. Some approaches use computers not so much to provide CAL exercises as to serve as facilitator (Sharples 1985), providing the learner with a toolkit to help learning process to place.

It is clear that computer, in the way they are at present used to EFL practice, are very useful in certain areas, but nevertheless essentially limited. To promote the computer as capable of providing the complete learning environment is therefore unrealistic. To recommend its use as an element in an overall learning environment, on the other hand, seems a more practicable approach.


  1. Effective Demands

The effective demands of working with computers vary with the user. Young learners, on the whole, experience little difficulty. It is generally older users, such as teachers, who may experience feeling inadequacy or even of hostility to the machines. These attitudes are probably fairly common, and may help to explain the slow spread of CAL.

2. Logistics


At the practical level, the biggest difficulty associated with using CAL in reading training or for other language work is getting enough computers. In most institutions using CAL, one machine per classroom (or more) is the rule. Student access to the machine is generally limited in time and shared with other people. (In fact, students can work at computers in pairs without loss of effectiveness).


While a certain amount of software is available, particularly for the BBC and Apple computers, the high costs of programming and the small sales compared with books mean that only limited amount of software is published ( Rope 1985,67). Furthermore, programs written for BBC computer, say, will not work on an Apple or an IBM. Translation programs do exist, but they only work under certain conditions.

2.3.Computer Screens.

It has been argued that the computer screen can be used in versatile ways. However it doesn’t look like paper, and presumably reading training should be primarily directed towards reading texts on the paper. When one finishes a page in a book, for example, one turns over to the next page. The computer on the other hand, usually scrolls, so the text you have been reading moves up to the top of the screen and disappears, while the new section of text moves up into the view from the bottom. It is much easier to find something by thumbing back through a book than by scrolling back a computer screen.

3. Methodological Limitations.

Some of the methodological limitations of CAL have been discussed already, such as the problems of dealing with unanticipated responses. Another restriction is that the computer cannot understand speech, so that most CAL practice at the keyboard is confined to reading and writing.

More insidious has been the impact of the computer on CAL methodology. Right from the beginnings of CAL around 1960 to the present, most CAL exercises have been drills, and in majority of them meaning secondary. Although applied linguistics and Cognitive Psychology have doubted the wisdom of using meaningless drill as a primary way of learning languages, such drill is still common in CAL practice, legitimated by the technology.


To summarize the argument of this paper: computers are powerful and versatile devices, but they do have a number of disadvantages, carry no guarantee of success, and need to be used with care. Introducing CAL doesn’t make the task of EFL teachers easier, for successful integration of the computer into the learning program demands ingenuity and effort. Programs exist for the development of reading strategies, for example, and to develop inference skills in assigning meaning to unknown words. More tool software will become available, giving readers access to dictionaries, lexicons etc. Integrated reading and writing work round projects, using word-processors and attendant spelling checkers etc, looks a promising area for development.

Computers are known to be motivating for students. To get the best results with them, teachers will need both enthusiasm and discernment.


Kim,S, Helen and Kamil, L, Michael. 2005. Successful uses of computer technology for reading instruction. (Accessed 18 Feb,2010).

Ingram ,Fiona.2010.Three reasons to use computers to teach critical reading skills.

Aebersold, Jo Ann and Fied, Mary Lee. 1997. From reader to reading teaching: Issues and strategies for second language classroom.Ed, Richard, Jack  C. Melbourne. Cambridge University.

Nuttal, Christine. 2005. Teaching reading skills in a foreign language. Thailand. Mc. Millan Publisher.

Ellis, R. 1984. Classroom second language development. Oxford. Pergamon.

Rigney, J.R .1962. Potential uses of computers as teaching machines. In J.E. Coulson (Ed.) Programmed learning and computer-based instruction. London.

Rope, A. 1984. Spreadread. London, Wida Software.

Sharples, M. 1985. Cognition, computers and creative writing.

Wells, G. 1981. Learning through interaction – the study of language development. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.

Widdowson, H.G. 1979. Explorations in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Williams, R. 1985. Teaching vocabulary recognition strategies in ESP reading: The ESP journal, 4, 121-131.

February 23, 2010 - Posted by | ICT Final Test, ICT in English Learning


  1. in which do I buy this

    Comment by Terrance | March 27, 2013 | Reply

  2. Thanks for the nice blog. In todays word, Computer is necessary in every field. It helps to enhance our practical skills.

    Comment by steel water tank, stainless steel tank | July 1, 2013 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: